Chesapeake Energy Restructures its Balance Sheet with Rapid-Fire Foreign Direct Investments

Chesapeake Energy Corporation, headquartered in Oklahoma City, is one of the largest producers of natural gas and the most active driller of new wells in the United States. Earlier this month, Chesapeake Energy announced that it expected to raise $5 billion of equity over the next 2 years to repay senior debt and increase investments. As part of that plan, it will sell up to a 20% stake in its Marcellus Shale properties before May 2011. Reuters reported that the sale of the Marcellus shale gas business will net Chesapeake at least $2 billion from the sale as part of its latest plan to raise cash. 

Now, Korea Investment Corp (KIC) and China Investment Corp (CIC) are turning their attention to natural resources, which they see as more tangible than financial services, and may have bought stakes in Chesapeake Energy. According to the Financial Times, KIC and CIC were set to lead a $900 million investment in Chesapeake Energy, becoming the latest Asia-based groups to focus on the sector. While Chesapeake is set to issue the convertible preferred stock, KIC and CIC are expected to acquire $300 million each. 

At the same time that it announced its intended restructuring, Chesapeake also announced a sale of $600 million of nonvoting 5.75% cumulative non-voting convertible preferred stock to an affiliate of Singapore state investor Temasek Holdings and an affiliate of Beijing-based Hopu Investment Management Company. The offshore investors also received an option to acquire $500 million of additional preferred stock for 30 days. 

The Asian funds generally believe the price of natural gas, trading at less than a third of the price of oil on an equivalent basis, is at a cyclical low point and that demand will climb for environmental reasons. 

Today Chesapeake announced that it has sold $1.7 billion of its 5.75% cumulative non-voting convertible preferred stock to Asian investors. Although the release does not specify, based on the prior press speculation, those investors could include KIC and CIC and indeed that KIC and CIC led the deal as forecasted. It could also mean that Temasek and Hopu exercised their option. Chesapeake may provide information to clarify.

Update on China's OFDI: Interest in US and Australia May be Related to Stimulus Package

China’s outbound foreign investment strategy continues to make news. TheStreet.com and other business media reported today reported yesterday that China Investment Corp. (CIC), China’s sovereign wealth fund with approximately $300 billion in assets, may be discussing an investment into, or joint venture with, The AES Corporation of Arlington, Virginia. AES operates electrical generating facilities and distribution systems across the globe, has more 25,000 employees and a market capitalization of $9.8 billion. Reuters has reported that last week a senior CIC official said that CIC is seeking minority investments in infrastructure projects as well as green energy projects. 

To view these media reports in proper context, it may be well to review a few basic facts about China’s current outbound foreign direct investment (OFDI) program, as reported by Xinhuanet on September 8. Xinhuanet based its story on a report jointly issued by China’s Ministry of Commerce, the National Bureau of Statistics and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange that same day.

  • China’s OFDI added up to US$183.97 billion by the end of 2008. 
  • The source of China’s OFDI is more than 8,500 domestic investors, whose overseas corporate assets in 2008 exceeded US$1 trillion. 
  • Chinese overseas enterprises employed about 1.03 million people, including 455,000 overseas employees.
  • China’s net OFDI in 2008 was US$55.91 billion, an increase of 111% from 2007.
  • Chinese investors have established approximately 12,000 enterprises overseas in 174 countries or regions. Approximately 71% of these enterprises were in Asia and Europe.
  • Among Chinese outbound investors, 50.2% were limited companies, 16.1% were state-owned enterprises and 9.4% were private companies. 
  • Investment by state-owned companies declined 3.6% from 2007.

Australia is a key target for China’s OFDI, because of that continent’s abundant raw materials and other material resources. Xinhuanet also reported that Australia is seeking to attract increased amounts of Chinese investment and deepen their bilateral economic cooperation, especially in the energy and natural resource sectors. The senior trade commissioner of the Australian Trade Commission confirmed Australia’s intentions at a international trade forum held in coastal Xiamen, Fujian Province, on September 8. 

Data from Australia’s foreign review board show that Chinese investment interest in Australia is on a strong upward trend. Even so, at the end of 2008, China’s total investment stock in Australia was only $6.83 billion, and represented an increase of 26.7% from the position at the end of 2007. With this significant increase, China ranked as Australia’s 13th largest foreign investor.

China’s surge in OFDI may be rooted in its internal $585 billion recession-fighting stimulus package. That package represented 13.2% of China’s gross domestic product for 2008. During Q1 of 2009, Chinese state-owned banks increased their lending by more than one trillion dollars, or more than half of the national GDP on an annualized basis. According to published reports, over half of the new loans went into China’s stock and property markets, generating speculation-driven increases in prices. The remainder went into the Chinese economy and is likely to be doubt a substantial factor driving China’s OFDI. Recognizing that increased China OFDI may be more than desirable for generating and maintaining its economic recovery, Australia’s recently revised foreign investment rules raised the dollar threshold for investments that require regulatory review. The change is expected to result in an increase in the number of Chinese investments in smaller Australian natural resource and energy companies. According to the Australian trade official referenced above, Chinese investment has not harmed Australia’s economic security and has enhanced the reputations of the investors. 

The U.S. is on a slower path with China. It is possible that if the AES discussions mature into a deal and if CFIUS and other regulatory review supports the deal, the pace of China’s OFDI into the United States will accelerate. Adverse regulatory responses will likely have a dampening effect when this country can least needs it. 

Updated: On September 16, in a follow-up article, Xinhuanet reported that, according to China’s Ministry of Commerce, OFDI by China's 136 centrally-administered state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in 2008 was $35.74 billion.  The investment accounted for 64% of China's total OFDI for the year.   This appears to be a significantly larger share than had been previously reported.